<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alfresco Open Source Barometer report flaw</title>
	<link>http://blog.generationjava.com/roller/bayard/entry/alfresco-open-source-barometer-report-flaw</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Nora von Ingersleben</title>
		<link>http://blog.generationjava.com/roller/bayard/entry/alfresco-open-source-barometer-report-flaw#comment-760</link>
		<author>Nora von Ingersleben</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 20:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.generationjava.com/roller/bayard/entry/alfresco-open-source-barometer-report-flaw#comment-760</guid>
		<description>It’s reassuring to know that somebody has read the full report and found the glaring weaknesses in Alfresco’s analysis.  Much of the commentary I have seen parrots Alfresco’s conclusions without examining their factual basis.  For additional discussion of the flaws in Alfresco’s analysis, take a look at my blog post on the report (http://blog.actonline.org/2007/08/alfresco-open-s.html#more).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s reassuring to know that somebody has read the full report and found the glaring weaknesses in Alfresco’s analysis.  Much of the commentary I have seen parrots Alfresco’s conclusions without examining their factual basis.  For additional discussion of the flaws in Alfresco’s analysis, take a look at my blog post on the report (http://blog.actonline.org/2007/08/alfresco-open-s.html#more).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
