<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AL 2.0 / GPLv2 clash</title>
	<link>http://blog.generationjava.com/roller/bayard/entry/al-20-gplv2-clash</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Ruby</title>
		<link>http://blog.generationjava.com/roller/bayard/entry/al-20-gplv2-clash#comment-1211</link>
		<author>Sam Ruby</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.generationjava.com/roller/bayard/entry/al-20-gplv2-clash#comment-1211</guid>
		<description>I think the Alfresco guys have it backwards.  The question is not whether the ASF has any patents, but whether Alfresco or their downstream users have any patents that the licensed ASF code infringes upon.  If they don't, the conclusion still works out to be the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Alfresco guys have it backwards.  The question is not whether the ASF has any patents, but whether Alfresco or their downstream users have any patents that the licensed ASF code infringes upon.  If they don&#8217;t, the conclusion still works out to be the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
