AIG etc

March 19th, 2009 by Hen

The AIG ’scandal’ is much fun.

I get the shock and horror on the part of the ‘taxpayer’ at money being spent on performance bonuses at a company who presumably ‘have not performed’ as a whole otherwise they wouldn’t be asking for a bail-out. It’s a problem though as companies do need to retain valuable staff and even companies in these situations should be giving bonuses to those who have performed. Presumably the lions share of the bonuses went to the top level, so hopefully the 90% congress tax issue has a reasonable non-taxed floor to allow performing employees to not get hit for board room greed.

The joke of it all though is that the government is bailing out a company whose board and highest level of leadership have failed financially in some way - why should they be shocked that the money is not well used. Hindsight would imply that the money should only have been given with indicate of an overhaul of the leadership leading to that lack of money.

One Response to “AIG etc”

  1. Phil Staudt Says:

    Now that we know all about what happened to 1/1000th of the taxpayer money given to AIG, we can assume that the other $169.8b has been managed just as wisely. But the media and AIG and Geithner are doing a good job of keeping us from looking at that.